CONVERSATION ABOUT PHYSICAL SPECULATION WITHOUT KNOWN FOUNDATION WITH THE AI ChatGPT

ME-How can I know if by subjecting the deuterium nuclei to strong electric fields, I would be able to change the charge of a proton to negative?

AI-Subjecting deuterium nuclei to strong electric fields cannot change the charge of a proton to negative. Deuterium nuclei are composed of a proton and a neutron, and subjecting them to electric fields will only affect the charge distribution in the nucleus, but will not change the charge of the proton.

Changing the charge of a proton to negative is an idea that has been proposed in speculative theories in physics, but there is currently no experimental evidence to suggest that this is possible. The charge of the proton is a fundamental property of nature and is considered constant.

It is important to note that modifying the proton charge, if possible, would have important implications for the laws of physics and the stability of matter. Therefore, if you want to explore more on this topic, it is advisable to consult the updated scientific literature and keep in mind that any claim about the possibility of changing the proton charge would require rigorous and reproducible experimental tests.

ME-Okay, I already knew that, but if we locate a mini black hole, in the immediate environment (the current physics allows it) and introduce enough protons into it, and then collapse that black hole, so that it becomes a pure accumulation of proton mass, with negative charge?

AI-No, it is not possible to convert a black hole into a pure accumulation of negatively charged proton mass by introducing protons and subsequently collapsing the black hole.

First, it is important to note that black hole physics is a branch of general relativity and cannot be described by the laws of quantum physics, which govern the behavior of subatomic particles. Therefore, the idea that a black hole could be used to change the proton's charge to negative is based on speculative hypotheses and has no solid scientific basis.

Moreover, black holes are not "shredders" of matter that can transform protons into purely negatively charged proton mass. When matter is attracted to a black hole, it is extremely compressed and heated, and eventually, matter becomes a singularity, which is a region of space-time in which known physical laws no longer apply. 

That is, the collapsed matter no longer has the properties it had before being attracted to the black hole, and it cannot be assumed that the charge of the protons would be maintained after the collapse.

In short, the idea that a black hole could be used to change the proton's charge to negative is a speculative idea with no solid scientific basis, and there is currently no experimental evidence to suggest that this is possible.

ME-True, what you say is so in this universe, but it seems likely, that in a different universe, within the multiverse, this speculation in this universe, would be real in the other universe.

AI-It is true that the concept of the multiverse suggests that there could be universes with different physical laws than those we observe in our universe.

In some of these hypothetical universes, the laws of physics could allow the existence of objects or phenomena that are not possible in our universe. However, it is important to note that the concept of the multiverse is a speculative idea that has not yet been confirmed by empirical evidence, and there is currently no way to verify the existence of other universes.

That said, in a hypothetical universe in which the laws of physics allowed the proton charge to be changed to negative by introducing protons into a mini black hole, then it would be possible for this idea to be real in that universe.

However, since there is still no empirical evidence for the existence of the multiverse and no other universes with different physical laws have been observed, we must take these hypotheses with caution and continue to base our understanding of physics on the laws we observe in our universe.